Coronary CT Angiography-Based Mechanomics Predicts Atherosclerotic Plaque Formation in Regions Proximal to Myocardial Bridging

CHEN Yanchun, ZHENG Jin, TENG Zhongzhao, ZHANG Longjiang

Abstract


Objective To assess with machine learning the predictive value of mechanomics derived from coronary CT angiography (CCTA) for atherosclerotic plaque formation in regions proximal to myocardial bridging (MB) in the left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD).

Methods This retrospective study included a cohort of patients with MB in LAD and no atherosclerotic plaque formation in LAD as confirmed by two CCTA conducted between January 2007 and April 2021 at our hospital. The interval between the two CCTA examinations was more than 3 months. The primary endpoint was the formation of atherosclerotic plaques in regions proximal to the myocardial bridging. Patient demographic characteristics and clinical risk factors were documented. Then, the patients were matched by age and sex in a 1-to-1 ratio and divided into two groups, those with plaque formation and those without plaque formation. Computational fluid dynamics analysis was performed based on CCTA. Key anatomical parameters of MB, including location, length, depth, and systolic compression index, were meticulously measured on the CCTA images. Mechanomic data were extracted from the region proximal to the MB. A multivariate Cox regression analysis was performed to identify significant features. A random forest algorithm was used to select mechanomic features for subsequent modeling and to assign scores for each patient's mechanomic features. The log-rank test and Kaplan-Meier curves were used to investigate the mechanomic model's predictive performance concerning plaque formation. Additionally, the operator characteristic curves were applied to evaluate how well the model could predict plaque formation across various myocardial bridge subgroups.

Results A total of 104 patients with LAD MB were recruited. The mean age of the subjects were (54.56±10.56) years and 75.00% (78/104) of them were male. Among them, 52 developed plaque formation over a median follow-up period of 3.0 years. Apart from a smoking history, which was more prevalent in the group with plaque formation than that in the group without plaque formation (21.15% vs. 5.77%, P=0.04), no significant differences between the groups were observed in terms of the other clinical or anatomical characteristics (all P≤0.05). The participants were divided into a training set (n=74) and a validation set (n=30) at a 7∶3 ratio. With the mechanomics model constructed using the random forest algorithm, the patients were classified into a high-score group (≥0.46) and a low-score group (<0.46) based on a cutoff score of 0.46. The mechanomics model achieved a sensitivity of 0.87 (0.58-0.98) and an accuracy of 0.63 (0.44-0.79) in the validation set. The multivariate Cox regression model revealed a strong positive association between mechanomics and plaque formation (hazards ratio [HR]: 10.58; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.23-34.64, P<0.001). The log-rank test showed that the high-score group in the mechanomics model was more likely to develop plaques at the proximal regions of the myocardial bridge compared to the low-score group (P<0.001). The area under the curve (AUC) for plaque formation, as predicted by the model, was 0.88 (95% CI: 0.82-0.95) for the entire population, 0.89 (95% CI: 0.82-0.96) for the training set, 0.86 (95% CI: 0.74-0.99) for the validation set, 0.92 (95% CI: 0.86-0.97) for the superficial MB group, 0.86 (95% CI: 0.74-0.98) for the long MB group, and 0.91 (95% CI: 0.83-0.98) for the short MB group.

Conclusion The mechanomic assessment holds substantial potential as a predictive tool for atherosclerotic plaque formation in regions proximal to MB in LAD.

 

Keywords: Coronary CT angiography, Myocardial bridge, Mechanomics, Plaque formation, Machine learning

 

Full Text:

PDF


References


THYGESEN K, ALPERT J S, WHITE H D. Joint ESC/ACCF/AHA/WHF Task Force for the redefinition of myocardial infarction. Universal definition of myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2007, 50(22): 2173-2195. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2007.09.011.

NEREM R M. Vascular fluid mechanics, the arterial wall, and atherosclerosis. J Biomech Eng, 1992, 114(3): 274-282. doi: 10.1115/1. 2891384.

HERRINGTON W, LACEY B, SHERLIKER P, et al. Epidemiology of atherosclerosis and the potential to reduce the global burden of atherothrombotic disease. Circ Res, 2016, 118(4): 535-546. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.115.307611.

CORBAN M T, HUNG O Y, ESHTEHARDI P, et al. Myocardial bridging: contemporary understanding of pathophysiology with implications for diagnostic and therapeutic strategies. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2014, 63(22): 2346-2355. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2014.01.049.

TARANTINI G, MIGLIORE F, CADEMARTIRI F, et al. Left anterior descending artery myocardial bridging: a clinical approach. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2016, 68(25): 2887-2899. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2016.09.973.

La GRUTTA L, RUNZA G, Lo RE G, et al. Prevalence of myocardial bridging and correlation with coronary atherosclerosis studied with 64-slice CT coronary angiography. Radiol Med, 2009, 114(7): 1024-1036. doi: 10.1007/s11547-009-0446-y.

ALEGRIA J R, HERRMANN J, HOLMES D R, Jr, et al. Myocardial bridging. Eur Heart J, 2005, 26(12): 1159-1168. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehi203.

BOURASSA M G, BUTNARU A, LESPÉRANCE J, et al. Symptomatic myocardial bridges: overview of ischemic mechanisms and current diagnostic and treatment strategies. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2003, 41(3): 351-359. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(02)02768-7.

DESSEIGNE P, TABIB A, LOIRE R. Myocardial bridging on the left anterior descending coronary artery and sudden death. Apropos of 19 cases with autopsy. Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss, 1991, 84(4): 511-516.

FELD H, GUADANINO V, HOLLANDER G, et al. Exercise-induced ventricular tachycardia in association with a myocardial bridge. Chest, 1991, 99(5): 1295-1296. doi: 10.1378/chest.99.5.1295.

NAKAURA T, NAGAYOSHI Y, AWAI K, et al. Myocardial bridging is associated with coronary atherosclerosis in the segment proximal to the site of bridging. J Cardiol, 2014, 63(2): 134-139. doi: 10.1016/j.jjcc.2013. 07.005.

HERRMANN J, HIGANO S T, LENON R J, et al. Myocardial bridging is associated with alteration in coronary vasoreactivity. Eur Heart J, 2004, 25(23): 2134-2142. doi: 10.1016/j.ehj.2004.08.015.

WEBER C, NOELS H. Atherosclerosis: current pathogenesis and therapeutic options. Nat Med, 2011, 17(11): 1410-1422. doi: 10.1038/nm. 2538.

MALEK A M, ALPER S L, IZUMO S. Hemodynamic shear stress and its role in atherosclerosis. JAMA, 1999, 282(21): 2035-2042. doi: 10.1001/jama.282.21.2035.

CHENG C, TEMPEL D, Van HAPEREN R, et al. Atherosclerotic lesion size and vulnerability are determined by patterns of fluid shear stress. Circulation, 2006, 113(23): 2744-2753. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATION AHA.105.590018.

JAVADZADEGAN A, YONG A S, CHANG M, et al. Flow recirculation zone length and shear rate are differentially affected by stenosis severity in human coronary arteries. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, 2013, 304(4): H559-H566. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00428.2012.

DORIOT P A, DORSAZ P A, NOBLE J. Could increased axial wall stress be responsible for the development of atheroma in the proximal segment of myocardial bridges? Theor Biol Med Model, 2007, 4: 29. doi: 10.1186/ 1742-4682-4-29.

NIKOLIĆ D, RADOVIĆ M, ALEKSANDRIĆ S, et al. Prediction of coronary plaque location on arteries having myocardial bridge, using finite element models. Comput Methods Programs Biomed, 2014, 117(2): 137-144. doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2014.07.012.

SHARZEHEE M, SEDDIGHI Y, SPRAGUE E A, et al. A hemodynamic comparison of myocardial bridging and coronary atherosclerotic stenosis: a computational model with experimental evaluation. J Biomech Eng, 2021, 143(3): 031013. doi: 10.1115/1.4049221.

HAN D, STARIKOV A, Ó HARTAIGH B, et al. Relationship between endothelial wall shear stress and high-risk atherosclerotic plaque characteristics for identification of coronary lesions that cause ischemia: a direct comparison with fractional flow reserve. J Am Heart Assoc, 2016, 5(12): e004186. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.116.004186.

PARK J B, CHOI G, CHUN E J, et al. Computational fluid dynamic measures of wall shear stress are related to coronary lesion characteristics. Heart, 2016, 102(20): 1655-1661. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2016-309299.

LEE J M, CHOI G, KOO B K, et al. Identification of high-risk plaques destined to cause acute coronary syndrome using coronary computed tomographic angiography and computational fluid dynamics. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging, 2019, 12(6): 1032-1043. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2018.01. 023.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.