Digital Pathology: Current Status and Prospects of Clinical Application
Abstract
In recent years, with the progress of image processing and network transmission technology, digital pathology (DP) is being more and more extensive applied in clinical practice, and new artificial-intelligence-assisted diagnosis technology based on digital imaging is emerging. Being a widely-used mature field, telepathology is changing the temporal and spatial scope of pathological diagnosis through remote electronic transmission of digital images. Fully digitized pathology departments are realizing the transformation of diagnostic modes and workflow from microscopic diagnosis to digital image computer review, and there have already been successful examples of large-scale fully digitized pathology departments. However, there are still many problems in the implementation of DP, for example, the quality stability and cost of the scanner, the validation of the system, the reengineering of the workflow, the training of pathologists and the change of their perception of DP, which all await further improvement. Although artificial intelligence diagnostic technology is showing great potential, its application in pathological work is still limited to the field of auxiliary diagnostics, and there is still a long way to go to the realization of comprehensive intelligent pathology. The rise of DP will bring about a profound change in the way of how pathological work is done and become a solid foundation for intelligent pathology.
Keywords: Digital pathology, Telepathology, Computational pathology, Artificial intelligence, Clinical application
Full Text:
PDFReferences
ABELS E, PANTANOWITZ L, AEFFNER F, et al. Computational pathology definitions, best practices, and recommendations for regulatory guidance: a white paper from the Digital Pathology Association. J Pathol, 2019,249(3): 286–294.
PANTANOWITZ L. Digital images and the future of digital pathology. J Pathol Inform, 2010, 1: 15[2020-11-02]. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih. gov/pmc/articles/PMC2941968/. doi: 10.4103/2153–3539.68332.
STATHONIKOS N, NGUYEN T Q, SPOTO C P, et al. Being fully digital: perspective of a Dutch academic pathology laboratory. Histopathology,2019,75(5): 621–635.
RETAMERO J A, ANEIROS-FERNANDEZ J, MORAL R G D. Complete digital pathology for routine histopathology diagnosis in a multicenter hospital network. Arch Pathol Lab Med,2020,144(2): 221–228.
CHENG C L, AZHAR A, SNG S H A, et al. Enabling digital pathology in the diagnostic setting: navigating through the implementation journey in an academic medical centre. J Clin Pathol,2016,69(9): 784–792.
WILLIAMS B J, KNOWLES C, TREANOR D. Maintaining quality diagnosis with digital pathology: a practical guide to ISO 15189 accreditation. J Clin Pathol,2019,72(10): 663–668.
THORSTENSON S, MOLIN J, LUNDSTRÖM C. Implementation of large-scale routine diagnostics using whole slide imaging in Sweden: digital pathology experiences 2006–2013. J Pathol Inform, 2014, 5(1): 14[2020-11-02]. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC 4023034/. doi: 10.4103/2153–3539.129452.
FRAGGETTA F, GAROZZO S, ZANNONI G F, et al. Routine digital pathology workflow: the Catania experience. J Pathol Inform, 2017, 8: 51[2020-11-02]. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC 5760840/. doi: 10.4103/jpi.jpi_58_17.
HARTMAN D J, PANTANOWITZ L, MCHUGH J S, et al. Enterprise implementation of digital pathology: feasibility, challenges, and opportunities. J Digit Imaging,2017,30(5): 555–560.
EVANS A J, SALAMA M E, HENRICKS W H, et al. Implementation of whole slide imaging for clinical purposes. Arch Pathol Lab Med Med, 2017,141(7): 944–959.
UNTERNAEHRER J, GROBHOLZ R, JANOWCZYK A, et al. Current opinion, status and future development of digital pathology in Switzerland. J Clin Pathol,2020,73(6): 341–346.
BELLIS M, METIAS S, NAUGLER C, et al. Digital pathology: attitudes and practices in the Canadian pathology community. J Pathol Inform, 2013, 4: 3[2020-11-02]. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC 3624704/. doi: 10.4103/2153–3539.108540.
WILLIAMS B J, LEE J, OIEN K A, et al. Digital pathology access and usage in the UK: results from a national survey on behalf of the National Cancer Research Institute’s CM-Path initiative. J Clin Pathol,2018,71(5): 463–466.
CHORDIA T D, VIKEY A, CHOUDHARY A B, et al. Current status and future trends in telepathology and digital pathology. J Oral Maxillofac Pathol,2016,20(2): 178–182.
VALLANGEON B D, HAWLEY J S, SLOANE R, et al. An assessment of pathology resident access to and use of technology: a nationwide survey. Arch Pathol Lab Med,2017,141(3): 431–436.
PANTANOWITZ L, EVANS A J, HASSELL L A, et al. American Telemedicine Association clinical guidelines for telepathology. J Pathol Inform, 2014, 5(1): 39[2020-11-02]. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4221880/. doi: 10.4103/2153–3539.143329.
ZARELLA M D, BOWMAN D, AEFFNER F, et al. A practical guide to whole slide imaging: a White Paper from the Digital Pathology Association. Arch Pathol Lab Med,2019,143(2): 222–234.
TELLEZ D, BALKENHOL M, OTTE-HOLLER I, et al. Whole-slide mitosis detection in H& E breast histology using PHH3 as a reference to train distilled stain-invariant convolutional networks. IEEE Trans Med Imaging,2018,37(9): 2126–2136.
JAKOBSEN M R, TEERAPAKPINYO C, SHUANGSHOTI S, et al. Comparison between digital image analysis and visual assessment of immunohistochemical HER2 expression in breast cancer. Pathol Res Pract,2018,214(12): 2087–2092.
ARVANITI E, FRICKER K S, MORET M, et al. Automated Gleason grading of prostate cancer tissue microarrays via deep learning. Sci Rep, 2018,8(1): 12054.
STEINER D F, MACDONALD R, LIU Y, et al. Impact of deep learning assistance on the histopathologic review of lymph nodes for metastaticbreast cancer. Am J Surg Pathol,2018,42(12): 1636–1646.
TIZHOOSH H R, PANTANOWITZ L. Artificial intelligence and digital pathology: challenges and opportunities. J Pathol Inform, 2018, 9: 38[2020-11-02]. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC 6289004/. doi: 10.4103/jpi.jpi_53_18.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.



