Clinical Value of Dual Tracer PET Imaging With 68Ga-PSMA and 18F-FDG in Patients With Metastatic Prostate Cancer

DAI Hongyuan, HUANG Shuhui, TIAN Tian, HOU Naifeng, ZENG Hao, WEI Qiang, HUANG Rui

Abstract


Objective 

In this study, we retrospectively analyzed the imaging characteristics of dual-tracer 68Ga-prostate specific membrane antigen (PSMA) and 18F-flurodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) in metastatic prostate cancer (mPCa) patients. We analyzed the uptake modes of the dual tracers, explored clinical pathological parameters affecting the 18F-FDG uptake in the lesions, and evaluated their prognostic implications for prostate specific antigen progression-free survival (PSA-PFS).

Methods 

A total of 41 mPCa patients who underwent dual-tracer PET/CT (68Ga-PSMA and 18F-FDG) scans between September 2021 and January 2024 were retrospectively enrolled. One patient had negative uptake of both PSMA and FDG. According to the uptake patterns of the 2 tracers, the other patients, 40 in total, were categorized in 2 groups, including group A consisting of 33 cases who showed PSMA and FDG dual and those who showed FDG only avidity, and group B consisting of 7 cases who showed PSMA avidity only. Comparative analyses of clinical pathological characteristics between group A and group B were conducted. The relationship between various parameters and PSA-PFS was analyzed by the Kaplan-Meier method.

Results 

A total of 26 patients (63.4%) were diagnosed with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), and 38 cases (92.7%) had a Gleason score of 8-9. Bone metastasis, the predominant type of distant metastasis, occurred in 36 cases (87.8%). The skeletal and distant lymph node metastases mostly showed a dual positive uptake pattern for both PSMA and FDG (85.7% [24/28] and 81.8% [9/11]). 37.5% (3/8) of the metastases to organs showed FDG only positive uptake pattern. The serum levels of prostate specific antigen (PSA) in group A were significantly higher than those in group B (P=0.013). A total of 13 patients of special pathological classification (intraductal carcinoma and neuroendocrine differentiation) were all found to be in group A. Among the 41 cases, 16 were lost to follow-up. Of the 25 patients who completed follow-up, 9 patients, with a median PSA value of 104 ng/mL, experienced PSA progression, while the 16 other patients, with a median PSA of 0.34 ng/mL, did not incur any PSA progression. There was significant difference in the median PSA between patients showing PSA progression and those who did not show PSA progression (P<0.001). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis revealed that the median PSA-PFS of patients of specific pathological classifications was 7 months, which was shorter than the 16 months of the patients with typical prostate cancer, with the difference between the two groups being statistically meaningful (P=0.043). The median PSA-PFS for group A was 30 months. With more than half of the patients in the group not experiencing any PSA progression, group B did not reach the median PSA-PFS (P=0.645).

Conclusion 

Dual-tracer PET/CT imaging with 68Ga-PSMA and 18F-FDG commonly exhibits avidity for both tracers in mPCa. Serum PSA level is a reliable biomarker for predicting FDG-positive lesions. mPCa presented with intraductal carcinoma and neuroendocrine differentiation tends to exhibit FDG avidity and is more susceptible to PSA progression.

 

Keywords: Metastatic prostate cancer, 68Ga-PSMA, 18F-FDG, Heterogeneity

 

Full Text:

PDF


References


ZHENG R S, CHEN R, HAN B F, et al. Cancer incidence and mortality in China, 2022. Chin J Oncol, 2024, 46(3): 221–231. doi: 10.3760/cma.j. cn112152-20240119-00035.

BOORJIAN S A, EASTHAM J A, GRAEFEN M, et al. A critical analysis of the long-term impact of radical prostatectomy on cancer control and function outcomes. Eur Urol, 2012, 61(4): 664–675. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo. 2011.11.053.

FAROLFI A, CALDERONI L, MATTANA F, et al. Current and emerging clinical applications of PSMA PET diagnostic imaging for prostate cancer. J Nucl Med, 2021, 62(5): 596–604. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.120.257238.

HAN S, WOO S, KIM Y J, et al. Impact of 68Ga-PSMA PET on the management of patients with prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Urol, 2018, 74(2): 179–190. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2018. 03.030.

FENDLER W P, CALAIS J, EIBER M, et al. Assessment of 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET accuracy in localizing recurrent prostate cancer: a prospective single-arm clinical trial. JAMA Oncol, 2019, 5(6): 856–863. doi: 10.1001/ jamaoncol.2019.0096.

WEBER M, FENDLER W P, RAVI KUMAR A S, et al. Prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography-detected disease extent and overall survival of patients with high-risk nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: an international multicenter retrospective study. Eur Urol, 2024, 85(6): 511–516. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2024.01.019.

KIM Y J, KIM Y I. Therapeutic responses and survival effects of 177Lu-PSMA-617 radioligand therapy in metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer: a meta-analysis. Clin Nucl Med, 2018, 43(10): 728–734. doi: 10. 1097/rlu.0000000000002210.

KRATOCHWIL C, FENDLER W P, EIBER M, et al. EANM procedure guidelines for radionuclide therapy with 177Lu-labelled PSMA-ligands (177Lu-PSMA-RLT). Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging, 2019, 46(12): 2536–2544. doi: 10.1007/s00259-019-04485-3.

HOFMAN M S, VIOLET J, HICKS R J, et al. [177Lu]-PSMA-617 radionuclide treatment in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (LuPSMA trial): a single-centre, single-arm, phase 2 study. Lancet Oncol, 2018, 19(6): 825–833. doi: 10.1016/s1470-2045(18)30198-0.

ALIPOUR R, AZAD A, HOFMAN M S. Guiding management of therapy in prostate cancer: time to switch from conventional imaging to PSMA PET? Ther Adv Med Oncol, 2019, 11: 1758835919876828. doi: 10.1177/ 1758835919876828.

PEREZ P M, HOPE T A, BEHR S C, et al. Intertumoral heterogeneity of F-FDG and 68Ga-PSMA uptake in prostate cancer pulmonary metastases. Clin Nucl Med, 2019, 44(1): e28–e32. doi: 10.1097/rlu. 0000000000002367.

CHEN R, WANG Y, ZHU Y, et al. The added value of 18F-FDG PET/CT compared with 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT in patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer. J Nucl Med, 2022, 63(1): 69–75. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.120. 262250.

CHEN R, WANG Y, SHI Y, et al. Diagnostic value of 18F-FDG PET/CT in patients with biochemical recurrent prostate cancer and negative 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging, 2021, 48(9): 2970–2977. doi: 10.1007/s00259-021-05221-6.

SWIHA M, PAPA N, SABAHI Z, et al. Development of a visually calculated SUV(mean) (HIT Score) on screening PSMA PET/CT to predict treatment response to 177Lu-PSMA therapy: comparison with quantitative SUV(mean) and patient outcomes. J Nucl Med, 2024, 65(6): 904-908. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.123.267014.

BAKHT M K, LOVNICKI J M, TUBMAN J, et al. Differential expression of glucose transporters and hexokinases in prostate cancer with a neuroendocrine gene signature: a mechanistic perspective for 18F-FDG imaging of PSMA-suppressed tumors. J Nucl Med, 2020, 61(6): 904–910. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.119.231068.

WEBER M, HADASCHIK B, FERDINANDUS J, et al. Prostate-specific membrane antigen-based imaging of castration-resistant prostate cancer. Eur Urol Focus, 2021, 7(2): 279–287. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2021.01.002.

JADVAR H. Imaging evaluation of prostate cancer with 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT: utility and limitations. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging, 2013, 40(Suppl 1): S5-S10. doi: 10.1007/s00259-013-2361-7.

MIURA N, MORI K, MOSTAFAEI H, et al. The prognostic impact of intraductal carcinoma of the prostate: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Urol, 2020, 204(5): 909–917. doi: 10.1097/ju.00000000 00001290.

HU C D, CHOO R, HUANG J. Neuroendocrine differentiation in prostate cancer: a mechanism of radioresistance and treatment failure. Front Oncol, 2015, 5: 90. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2015.00090.

WASINGER G, CUSSENOT O, COMPÉRAT E. Clinical management of intraductal carcinoma of the prostate. Cancers (Basel), 2024, 16(9): 1650. doi: 10.3390/cancers16091650.

WANG H T, YAO Y H, LI B G, et al. Neuroendocrine Prostate Cancer (NEPC) progressing from conventional prostatic adenocarcinoma: factors associated with time to development of NEPC and survival from NEPC diagnosis-a systematic review and pooled analysis. J Clin Oncol, 2014, 32(30): 3383–3390. doi: 10.1200/jco.2013.54.3553.

PARIDA G K, TRIPATHY S, DATTA GUPTA S, et al. Adenocarcinoma prostate with neuroendocrine differentiation: potential utility of 18F-FDG PET/CT and 68Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT over 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT. Clin Nucl Med, 2018, 43(4): 248–249. doi: 10.1097/rlu.0000000000002013.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.