Clinical Value of Dual Tracer PET Imaging With 68Ga-PSMA and 18F-FDG in Patients With Metastatic Prostate Cancer
Abstract
Objective
In this study, we retrospectively analyzed the imaging characteristics of dual-tracer 68Ga-prostate specific membrane antigen (PSMA) and 18F-flurodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) in metastatic prostate cancer (mPCa) patients. We analyzed the uptake modes of the dual tracers, explored clinical pathological parameters affecting the 18F-FDG uptake in the lesions, and evaluated their prognostic implications for prostate specific antigen progression-free survival (PSA-PFS).
Methods
A total of 41 mPCa patients who underwent dual-tracer PET/CT (68Ga-PSMA and 18F-FDG) scans between September 2021 and January 2024 were retrospectively enrolled. One patient had negative uptake of both PSMA and FDG. According to the uptake patterns of the 2 tracers, the other patients, 40 in total, were categorized in 2 groups, including group A consisting of 33 cases who showed PSMA and FDG dual and those who showed FDG only avidity, and group B consisting of 7 cases who showed PSMA avidity only. Comparative analyses of clinical pathological characteristics between group A and group B were conducted. The relationship between various parameters and PSA-PFS was analyzed by the Kaplan-Meier method.
Results
A total of 26 patients (63.4%) were diagnosed with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), and 38 cases (92.7%) had a Gleason score of 8-9. Bone metastasis, the predominant type of distant metastasis, occurred in 36 cases (87.8%). The skeletal and distant lymph node metastases mostly showed a dual positive uptake pattern for both PSMA and FDG (85.7% [24/28] and 81.8% [9/11]). 37.5% (3/8) of the metastases to organs showed FDG only positive uptake pattern. The serum levels of prostate specific antigen (PSA) in group A were significantly higher than those in group B (P=0.013). A total of 13 patients of special pathological classification (intraductal carcinoma and neuroendocrine differentiation) were all found to be in group A. Among the 41 cases, 16 were lost to follow-up. Of the 25 patients who completed follow-up, 9 patients, with a median PSA value of 104 ng/mL, experienced PSA progression, while the 16 other patients, with a median PSA of 0.34 ng/mL, did not incur any PSA progression. There was significant difference in the median PSA between patients showing PSA progression and those who did not show PSA progression (P<0.001). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis revealed that the median PSA-PFS of patients of specific pathological classifications was 7 months, which was shorter than the 16 months of the patients with typical prostate cancer, with the difference between the two groups being statistically meaningful (P=0.043). The median PSA-PFS for group A was 30 months. With more than half of the patients in the group not experiencing any PSA progression, group B did not reach the median PSA-PFS (P=0.645).
Conclusion
Dual-tracer PET/CT imaging with 68Ga-PSMA and 18F-FDG commonly exhibits avidity for both tracers in mPCa. Serum PSA level is a reliable biomarker for predicting FDG-positive lesions. mPCa presented with intraductal carcinoma and neuroendocrine differentiation tends to exhibit FDG avidity and is more susceptible to PSA progression.
Keywords: Metastatic prostate cancer, 68Ga-PSMA, 18F-FDG, Heterogeneity
Full Text:
PDFReferences
ZHENG R S, CHEN R, HAN B F, et al. Cancer incidence and mortality in China, 2022. Chin J Oncol, 2024, 46(3): 221–231. doi: 10.3760/cma.j. cn112152-20240119-00035.
BOORJIAN S A, EASTHAM J A, GRAEFEN M, et al. A critical analysis of the long-term impact of radical prostatectomy on cancer control and function outcomes. Eur Urol, 2012, 61(4): 664–675. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo. 2011.11.053.
FAROLFI A, CALDERONI L, MATTANA F, et al. Current and emerging clinical applications of PSMA PET diagnostic imaging for prostate cancer. J Nucl Med, 2021, 62(5): 596–604. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.120.257238.
HAN S, WOO S, KIM Y J, et al. Impact of 68Ga-PSMA PET on the management of patients with prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Urol, 2018, 74(2): 179–190. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2018. 03.030.
FENDLER W P, CALAIS J, EIBER M, et al. Assessment of 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET accuracy in localizing recurrent prostate cancer: a prospective single-arm clinical trial. JAMA Oncol, 2019, 5(6): 856–863. doi: 10.1001/ jamaoncol.2019.0096.
WEBER M, FENDLER W P, RAVI KUMAR A S, et al. Prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography-detected disease extent and overall survival of patients with high-risk nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: an international multicenter retrospective study. Eur Urol, 2024, 85(6): 511–516. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2024.01.019.
KIM Y J, KIM Y I. Therapeutic responses and survival effects of 177Lu-PSMA-617 radioligand therapy in metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer: a meta-analysis. Clin Nucl Med, 2018, 43(10): 728–734. doi: 10. 1097/rlu.0000000000002210.
KRATOCHWIL C, FENDLER W P, EIBER M, et al. EANM procedure guidelines for radionuclide therapy with 177Lu-labelled PSMA-ligands (177Lu-PSMA-RLT). Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging, 2019, 46(12): 2536–2544. doi: 10.1007/s00259-019-04485-3.
HOFMAN M S, VIOLET J, HICKS R J, et al. [177Lu]-PSMA-617 radionuclide treatment in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (LuPSMA trial): a single-centre, single-arm, phase 2 study. Lancet Oncol, 2018, 19(6): 825–833. doi: 10.1016/s1470-2045(18)30198-0.
ALIPOUR R, AZAD A, HOFMAN M S. Guiding management of therapy in prostate cancer: time to switch from conventional imaging to PSMA PET? Ther Adv Med Oncol, 2019, 11: 1758835919876828. doi: 10.1177/ 1758835919876828.
PEREZ P M, HOPE T A, BEHR S C, et al. Intertumoral heterogeneity of F-FDG and 68Ga-PSMA uptake in prostate cancer pulmonary metastases. Clin Nucl Med, 2019, 44(1): e28–e32. doi: 10.1097/rlu. 0000000000002367.
CHEN R, WANG Y, ZHU Y, et al. The added value of 18F-FDG PET/CT compared with 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT in patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer. J Nucl Med, 2022, 63(1): 69–75. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.120. 262250.
CHEN R, WANG Y, SHI Y, et al. Diagnostic value of 18F-FDG PET/CT in patients with biochemical recurrent prostate cancer and negative 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging, 2021, 48(9): 2970–2977. doi: 10.1007/s00259-021-05221-6.
SWIHA M, PAPA N, SABAHI Z, et al. Development of a visually calculated SUV(mean) (HIT Score) on screening PSMA PET/CT to predict treatment response to 177Lu-PSMA therapy: comparison with quantitative SUV(mean) and patient outcomes. J Nucl Med, 2024, 65(6): 904-908. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.123.267014.
BAKHT M K, LOVNICKI J M, TUBMAN J, et al. Differential expression of glucose transporters and hexokinases in prostate cancer with a neuroendocrine gene signature: a mechanistic perspective for 18F-FDG imaging of PSMA-suppressed tumors. J Nucl Med, 2020, 61(6): 904–910. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.119.231068.
WEBER M, HADASCHIK B, FERDINANDUS J, et al. Prostate-specific membrane antigen-based imaging of castration-resistant prostate cancer. Eur Urol Focus, 2021, 7(2): 279–287. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2021.01.002.
JADVAR H. Imaging evaluation of prostate cancer with 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT: utility and limitations. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging, 2013, 40(Suppl 1): S5-S10. doi: 10.1007/s00259-013-2361-7.
MIURA N, MORI K, MOSTAFAEI H, et al. The prognostic impact of intraductal carcinoma of the prostate: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Urol, 2020, 204(5): 909–917. doi: 10.1097/ju.00000000 00001290.
HU C D, CHOO R, HUANG J. Neuroendocrine differentiation in prostate cancer: a mechanism of radioresistance and treatment failure. Front Oncol, 2015, 5: 90. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2015.00090.
WASINGER G, CUSSENOT O, COMPÉRAT E. Clinical management of intraductal carcinoma of the prostate. Cancers (Basel), 2024, 16(9): 1650. doi: 10.3390/cancers16091650.
WANG H T, YAO Y H, LI B G, et al. Neuroendocrine Prostate Cancer (NEPC) progressing from conventional prostatic adenocarcinoma: factors associated with time to development of NEPC and survival from NEPC diagnosis-a systematic review and pooled analysis. J Clin Oncol, 2014, 32(30): 3383–3390. doi: 10.1200/jco.2013.54.3553.
PARIDA G K, TRIPATHY S, DATTA GUPTA S, et al. Adenocarcinoma prostate with neuroendocrine differentiation: potential utility of 18F-FDG PET/CT and 68Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT over 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT. Clin Nucl Med, 2018, 43(4): 248–249. doi: 10.1097/rlu.0000000000002013.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.



