Clinical Significance of Hip Rotation Center Location after Reconstruction with Modular Hemipelvic Prostheses for Pelvic Tumor

LUO Yi, DUAN Hong, LUO Jiao-ming. et al

Abstract

To investigatethe clinical significance of hip rotation center location after reconstruction with modular hemipelvic prostheses for periacetabula tumors. Methods Forty-two patients who received periacetabular tumor resection and reconstruction with modular hemipelvic prosthesis between January 2004 and January 2014 in our institute were included. Postoperative complications, function (measured by MSTS score), survival rate and recurrence rate were analyzed. The position of prosthetic hip rotation center was measured. By its deviation angle from the ideal rotation center, the patients were divided into inward group, normal group and outward group in the horizontal level, and upward group, normal group and downward group in the vertical direction. And the relationship between positional difference of prosthetic hip rotation center and function at 1 month, 3 months, 6 months and 12 months after surgery was analyzed. Results Of forty-two cases in total, 25 patients were male and 17 patients were female. The age of the patients ranged from 12 and 69 years (median, 38 years).The minimal followup period was 12 months (mean,36 months; range,12-86 months).The complication rate was 31.0% and hip dislocation rate was 7.1%. The overall survival rate was 69.4% at 3 years and 43.7% at 5 years. After 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, the function of the reconstructed hip gradually improved, with MSTS score showing an increasing trend. The MSTS scores at these three time points were compared, the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). The improvement of function after 6 months and 12 months was not obvious, with the difference not being statistically significant (P> 0.05). The deviation of hip rotation center in the longitudinal direction and the horizontal direction did not affect the function of the hip (P>0.05). Conclusion It is safe and effective for patients with pelvictumorto receive modular hemipelvic prosthesis reconstruction once the prosthesis is fixed in the most firmly position, where soft tissue fully covered, the muscles could be rebuilt more easily andwhere the eccentricity of the femoral got a certain degree of recovery. The relationship between the deviation of hip rotation center and postoperative function needs to be confirmed.

 

Keywords: Modular hemipelvic prosthesis, Resection, Reconstruction, Centre of rotation, Function evaluation 

 

Full Text:

PDF


References


FODISCH HJ, К RAINER I, HOPKER WW. Et al. On the epidemiology of tumors and tumor-like lesions of bone in childhood and adolescence (author's transl). Verh Dtsch Ges Pathol, 1974(58): 441-444.

ENNEKING WF. DUNHAM W, GEBHARDT MC, etal. A system for the functional evaluation of reconstructive procedures after surgical treatment of tumors of the musculoskeletal system. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 1993 ( 286): 241-246.

NIEDER E. ELSON RA, ENGELBRECHT E. et al. The saddle prosthesis for salvage of the destroyed acetabulum. J Bone Joint Surg Br, 1990,72(6): 1014-1022.

ALJASSIR F, BEADEL GP, TURCOTTE RE, et al. Outcome after pelvic sarcoma resection reconstructed with saddle prosthesis. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2005 ( 438); 36-41. doi: 10. 1097/01. bio. 0000179588. 19479. 34.

JANSEN JA, VAN DE SANDE MA, DIJKSTRA PD, et al. Poor long-term clinical results of saddle prosthesis after resection of periacetabular tumors. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2013,471(1):324-331.

DAI KR, YAN MN, ZHU ZA, et al. Computer-aided custom-made hemipelvic prosthesis used in extensive pelvic lesions. J Arthroplasty,2007,22(7);981 -986.

SUN W, LI J, LI Q. et al. Clinical effectiveness of hemipelvic reconstruction using computer-aided custom-made prostheses after resection of malignant pelvic tumors. J Arthroplasty, 2011 ,26(8); 1508-1513.

GUO Z, LI J. PEI OX. et al. Pelvic reconstruction with a combined hemipelvic prostheses after resection of primary malignant tumor. Surg Oncol.2010,19(2) ;95-105.

JI T, GUO W, TANG ХD. et al. Reconstruction of type II + III pelvic resection with a modular hemipelvic endoprosthesis; a finite element analysis study. Orthop Surg. 2010,2(4):272-277.

TANG X. GUO W, JI T, et al. Reconstruction with modular hemipelvic prosthesis for the resection of solitary periacetabular metastasis. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg.2011. 131(12):1609-1615.

JI T, GUO W. YANG RL, el al. Modular hemipelvic endoprosthesis reconstruction experience in 100 patients with mid-term follow-up results. Eur J Surg Oncol, 2013,39 (1);53-60.

ZHOU Y, DUAN H, LIU Y. et al. Outcome after pelvic sarcoma resection and reconstruction with a modular hemipelvic prostheses. Int Orthop,2011,35(12): 1839-1846.

ZHOU Y, MIN L. LIU Y, et al. Finite element analysis of the pelvis after modular hemipelvic endoprosthesis reconstruction. Int Orthop,2013,37(4) :653-658.

WANG В. XIE X, YIN J. et al. Reconstruction with modular hemipelvic endoprosthesis after pelvic tumor resection: a report of 50 consecutive cases. PLoS One. 2015. 10(5): e0127263. doi: 10. 1371/journal, pone. 0127263. eCollection 2015.

ANGELINI A, DRAGO G, TROVARELLI G, et al. Infection after surgical resection for pelvic hone tumors: an analysis of 270 patients from one institution. Clin Orthop Relat Res,2014 ,472(1); 349-359.

WITTE D, BERND U BRUNS J, et al. Limb-salvage reconstruction with MUTARS hemipelvic endoprosthesis: a prospective multicenter study. Eur J Surg Oncol, 2009, 35 (12):1318-1325.

MCCOLLUM DE, GRAY WJ. Dislocation after total hip arthroplasty. Causes and prevention. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 1990(261):159-170.

KLEEMANN RU, HELLER MO, STOECKLE U, et al. THA loading arising from increased femoral anteversion and offset may lead to critical cement stresses. J Orthop Res, 2003,21(5):767-774.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.